Not a Fix-All
Electing progressive prosecutors is but one tool in a multifaceted, collaborative approach to ending mass incarceration.
13 posts in ‘bail reform’
Electing progressive prosecutors is but one tool in a multifaceted, collaborative approach to ending mass incarceration.
Not all so-called progressive prosecutors are doing enough to dismantle mass incarceration. But they’re better than the alternative.
Progressive prosecutors have delivered tangible and rapid wins to a grassroots movement seeking to end mass incarceration.
Believing that prosecutors can play a role in ending mass incarceration requires imagining a prosecutor whose goal is non-reformist reforms.
Prosecution can be redefined to focus on effective problem-solving through policies and initiatives that make us a safer, healthier community.
Can a prosecutor, even a progressive or reform-minded one, really help dismantle mass incarceration?
In Illinois, ending money bond was our target. Pretrial freedom is our goal.
As organizers in Illinois know well, it is necessary to engage with criminalizing institutions to better learn how to defeat them.
Fearmongering about public safety played a major role in the state’s midterm setback. But we can learn from it how to take control of the political narrative.
Incarceration ahead of trial is fundamentally unjust—a form of punishment that makes it virtually impossible to fight for your freedom.
As demands grow louder for decarcerating and shutting down New York City’s deadly jail complex, judges and prosecutors have escaped accountability. But they’re the ones driving the crisis.
Before bold, decarceral changes can become a reality, community organizers tirelessly move the policy needle in other ways. Here’s how they did it in Illinois.
Nothing short of immediately getting people out of New York City's jail complex, and keeping others from going in, will prevent the death and horror now ravaging it.